1995-05-03                     Senate Journal                      Page 1494
SB 115                                                                       
Senator Duncan gave notice of reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE                 
BILL NO. 115(FIN) am "An Act repealing the Uniform Reciprocal                  
Enforcement of Support Act; enacting the Uniform Interstate Family             
Support Act; relating to administrative establishment and                      
disestablishment of paternity and establishing paternity by affidavit;         
relating to child support enforcement; amending Alaska Rules of                
Civil Procedure 79, 82, and 90.3(h)(2); and providing for an effective         
date" and moved and asked unanimous consent that it be taken up                
at this time.  Without objection, it was so ordered.                           
                                                                               
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 115(FIN) am was before the Senate                       
in third reading on reconsideration.                                           
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the Senate              
Finance Committee Letter of Intent offered on page 1405 be adopted.            
Without objection, the Senate Letter of Intent was adopted.                    
                                                                               
The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL                     
NO. 115(FIN) am "An Act repealing the Uniform Reciprocal                       
Enforcement of Support Act; enacting the Uniform Interstate Family             
Support Act; relating to administrative establishment and                      
disestablishment of paternity and establishing paternity by affidavit;         
relating to child support enforcement; amending Alaska Rules of                
Civil Procedure 79, 82, and 90.3(h)(2); and providing for an effective         
date" pass the Senate?"  The roll was taken with the following                 
result:                                                                        
                                                                               
                                                                               

1995-05-03                     Senate Journal                      Page 1495
SB 115                                                                       
                                                                               
CSSB 115(FIN) am                                                               
Third Reading - On Reconsideration                                             
Effective Dates                                                                
Court Rule Changes                                                             
                                                                               
YEAS:  19   NAYS:  1   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford,                    
Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger,            
Salo, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff                                               
                                                                               
Nays:  Sharp                                                                   
                                                                               
and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 115(FIN) am passed the                          
Senate on reconsideration.                                                     
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule            
changes and effective date clauses.  Without objection, it was so              
ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.